2 Jan 2018

D00 1.d4 d5: Unusual lines (1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nc3 Bf5 4.Bf4)

D00 1.d4 d5: Unusual lines (1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nc3 Bf5 4.Bf4)

Over three years ago a game was played at Red Hot Pawn, which I am going through today. The first critical moment of the game was seen after 9.Bxe4. I had two ways to take the bishop and alas I chose the inferior one, 9...dxe4. The difference between the two moves is that in the game continuation the knight from f3 can move to g5 and I could have ended in serious trouble, had I tried to defend the pawn with 10...Qc6 because of the reply 11.d5 and my position would have fallen apart, but had I played 9...Bxe4, my bishop would have been either a better bishop than on the game continuation or the knight on c3 would have captured it. I would have taken the knight with my pawn and the knight would have needed to move to d2, for instance, which is a passive square for the knight.

Then I would have just simply defended the pawn on e4 with f5. In the game marieclaire played 10.Nh4 and went after my bishop. That was actually a good sign from my point of view, as I was able improve my position without any real dangers to worry about. The second important moment in the game was seen in my opinion after my 15th move Bg6. There my opponent played 16.f3, which did not look like a good idea because after I took it with my e-pawn, the scope of my bishop was increased and it targeted the pawn on c2. My opponent probably thought that it would not be that dangerous and marieclaire did get a double attack on b7 and f6 with the queen, when she took the pawn on f3.

The double attack was not that dangerous because I moved my knight to d5 and blocked the diagonal. Marieclaire then took on d5 and I had a choice to capture the knight with the queen or with the pawn. I captured it with the pawn, since I did not like the idea of trading queens for some reason. Alas, it would seem that 18...Qxd5 was the correct capture and for a brief moment the position had became roughly equal once again.

Marieclaire's final downhill started with the move 19.Rdf1, sometimes it is important which rook to move... The rook was needed on d1 because in order to improve the location of the knight, it needs to go to d3 via e1 and when it lands on d3, it would be possible to take it with the bishop and if the rook is not there, a pawn in front of the king would need to capture and problems could be seen on the horizon. I continued the game by castling on the queenside and then marieclaire made a huge blunder, 20.Qf6, which was the reason I eventually won the game. It lost a pawn due to the continuation 20...Qxf6 21.Rxf6 hxg4 and marieclaire could not safely take back with the h-pawn due to the pin on the h-file. The game was easy to play after that but my opponent only resigned after 31...g2, when it was clear that I would promote one of my pawns on the next move.

[Event "Corr game 15.5.2014-23.6.2014"] [Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"] [Date "2014.05.15"] [Round "?"] [White "marieclaire"] [Black "Vierjoki, Timo"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "D00"] [WhiteElo "1588"] [BlackElo "1863"] [Annotator "Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT (30s), TV"] [PlyCount "62"] [EventDate "2014.??.??"] 1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 Nf6 {Queen Pawn Game: Symmetrical Variation} 3. Nc3 (3. c4 dxc4 {Queen's Gambit Accepted: Deferred}) (3. e3 e6 4. Bd3 c5 5. b3 {Queen Pawn Game: Rubinstein Variation}) 3... Bf5 4. Bf4 {D00 1 d4 d5: Unusual lines} e6 5. a3 Bd6 6. Bxd6 (6. Bg5 Nbd7 7. Nb5 O-O 8. Nxd6 cxd6 9. e3 Qb6 10. b3 Rfc8 11. Bd3 Bxd3 12. Qxd3 Qa5+ 13. b4 Qa4 14. Rc1 Rc6 15. Bf4 Rac8 16. O-O Rc3 17. Qd1 Ne8 18. Ra1 Nb6 19. Ne1 Nc4 20. Qc1 Nc7 {Dollah,Z (2200)-Nguyen,T (2404) Bandar Seri Begawan 2001 0-1}) (6. Bg3 Bxg3 7. hxg3 Nc6 8. e3 a6 9. Bd3 Bxd3 10. Qxd3 Qd6 11. O-O-O O-O-O 12. Ng5 Rd7 13. e4 dxe4 14. Ncxe4 Nxe4 15. Nxe4 Qxd4 16. Qxd4 Rxd4 17. Rxd4 Nxd4 18. Ng5 h6 19. Nxf7 Rf8 20. Ne5 Rxf2 {Salazar Rojas, M-Malgac,O Porto Carras 2013 0-1}) 6... Qxd6 7. e3 a6 8. Bd3 Ne4 $146 ( 8... Bxd3 9. cxd3 O-O 10. h3 Nc6 11. O-O e5 12. Nxe5 Nxe5 13. dxe5 Qxe5 14. d4 Qg5 15. Rc1 c6 16. Na4 Ne4 17. Nb6 Rad8 18. Re1 Rd6 19. Rc2 Re8 20. Na4 Rh6 21. Qf3 Rhe6 22. Qf4 Qxf4 23. exf4 {Duong,T-Le,T Ho Chi Minh City 2005 0-1 (41)}) ( 8... Bg6 9. Ne5 Nbd7 10. Nxd7 Qxd7 11. Bxg6 hxg6 12. Qd2 Qd6 13. h3 O-O-O 14. O-O-O Kb8 15. Rhe1 Rde8 16. e4 dxe4 17. Nxe4 Nxe4 18. Rxe4 Qd5 19. Qe3 Qa2 20. Qc3 Rhf8 {0-1 (20) Charlier,P (1591)-Burnay,G (1850) Fontaine 2009}) 9. Bxe4 dxe4 (9... Bxe4 10. Nxe4 dxe4 11. Nd2 $11) 10. Nh4 Nd7 11. Qe2 (11. Qh5 $5 g6 12. Qh6 $14) 11... Nf6 $11 12. h3 {Consolidates g4} h5 13. O-O-O Bh7 14. g4 { White threatens to win material: g4xh5} g5 {Black threatens to win material: g5xh4} 15. Ng2 Bg6 (15... hxg4 16. h4 gxh4 17. Rxh4 O-O-O $11) 16. f3 (16. h4 $142 $5 {must be considered} O-O-O 17. hxg5 Nxg4 18. Nf4 $14) 16... exf3 $17 { Black forks: e2+g2} 17. Qxf3 Nd5 18. Nxd5 (18. Ne2 O-O-O 19. e4 Qc6 $17) 18... exd5 {White has a new backward pawn: e3. Black has a new backward pawn: f7} ( 18... Qxd5 19. Qxd5 exd5 20. Rhf1 $17) 19. Rdf1 (19. Rhf1 O-O-O 20. Ne1 Rdf8 $15) 19... O-O-O $17 20. Qf6 $4 {strolling merrily down the path to disaster} ( 20. Qe2 $142 Kb8 21. Ne1 $17) 20... Qxf6 $19 21. Rxf6 hxg4 22. h4 Rde8 (22... Be4 $142 {keeps an even firmer grip} 23. Rg1 gxh4 24. Nxh4 Rxh4 25. Rxf7 $19) 23. Re1 (23. Rff1 {is one last hope} Be4 24. Rfg1 $19) 23... gxh4 24. Nf4 (24. Rh1 {doesn't improve anything} h3 25. Nf4 Be4 $19) 24... Be4 25. Rxf7 Reg8 26. Ne6 c6 27. Nc5 h3 28. Nxe4 dxe4 29. Kd2 g3 30. Ke2 h2 31. Rh1 (31. Rff1 { does not help much} g2 32. Kd2 g1=Q 33. Rxg1 Rxg1 34. Re2 h1=Q 35. Kc3 Qf3 36. Re1 Rxe1 37. d5 cxd5 38. Kb4 Qf8+ 39. Ka4 Qe8+ 40. Kb3 Qb5+ 41. Ka2 Qc4+ 42. b3 Qxc2#) 31... g2 (31... g2 32. Rff1 gxh1=Q 33. Rxh1 Rg2+ 34. Kd1 Rf8 35. Kc1 Rff2 36. Kb1 Rxc2 37. a4 Rxb2+ 38. Ka1 Rbf2 39. Rd1 Rg1 40. Rb1 Rxb1+ 41. Kxb1 h1=Q#) 0-1

There were actually three reference games that I was able to find when looking the position after 4.Bf4 and where both players were rated over 2500, but one of the games I did not include because it was a 10 move draw. That game was also played by Grandmaster Ulf Andersson.

[Event "Kloosters"] [Site "Ter Apel"] [Date "1997.03.18"] [Round "2"] [White "Andersson, Ulf"] [Black "Khalifman, Alexander"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A46"] [WhiteElo "2655"] [BlackElo "2650"] [PlyCount "31"] [EventDate "1997.03.17"] [EventType "tourn"] [EventRounds "5"] [EventCountry "NED"] [EventCategory "16"] [SourceTitle "CBM 058"] [Source "ChessBase"] [SourceDate "1997.06.01"] 1. Nf3 d6 2. d4 Nf6 3. Nc3 d5 4. Bf4 Bf5 5. e3 c6 6. Bd3 e6 7. O-O Be7 8. h3 O-O 9. Rb1 Nbd7 10. b4 Bg6 11. Ne5 Nxe5 12. Bxe5 Nd7 13. Bg3 Bf6 14. Ne2 b5 15. Nf4 Nb6 16. Nxg6 1/2-1/2 [Event "Champions Challenge 178th"] [Site "playchess.com INT"] [Date "2006.12.23"] [Round "4.2"] [White "Moradiabadi, Elshan"] [Black "Drozdovskij, Yuri"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "D02"] [WhiteElo "2539"] [BlackElo "2561"] [PlyCount "58"] [EventDate "2006.12.23"] [EventType "k.o. (blitz)"] [EventRounds "6"] [EventCountry "GER"] [SourceTitle "EXT 2008"] [Source "ChessBase"] [SourceDate "2007.11.25"] 1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nc3 Bf5 4. Bf4 e6 5. e3 Bd6 6. Ne5 Nfd7 7. g4 Bxe5 8. dxe5 Bg6 9. h4 h5 10. g5 Nc6 11. Bb5 Nb4 12. Ba4 c6 13. a3 Na6 14. b4 Nc7 15. Bb3 a5 16. O-O Qe7 17. Qd4 b6 18. Ba4 b5 19. Bb3 a4 20. Ba2 O-O 21. e4 Rfd8 22. Rad1 Rac8 23. f3 c5 24. bxc5 Nxc5 25. exd5 exd5 26. Qe3 N5e6 27. Nxd5 Nxd5 28. Bxd5 Nxf4 29. Qxf4 Qc5+ 0-1

1 Jan 2018

D00 1.d4 d5: Unusual lines (1.Nf3 d5 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 c6)

D00 1.d4 d5: Unusual lines (1.Nf3 d5 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 c6)

Nearly seven years ago I played a game at GameKnot, which I am sharing today. The deciding mistake of the game was seen as early as move 6, when adamscheeks played Ne5. Up to that move both players had made reasonable moves, though 4.h3 might be a bit of a mistake. Moving the knight to e5 lost a pawn for no compensation in the game continuation 6...Nxe5 7.dxe5 Qxe5.

I was able to maintain the advantage firmly in my grasp and I was able to prevent my opponent from castling, which restricted my opponent's possibilities quite a lot. The game was continued up to the move 22...Rd8#.

Game number two. The time control was 7 days per move, but the game ended in less than a month. It started on December 5th, 2010 and finished on January 4th, 2011. The statistics from the LiveBook have been taken on April 4th, 2018.

[Event "Challenge from adamscheeks"] [Site "http://gameknot.com/chess.pl?"] [Date "2011.02.13"] [Round "?"] [White "adamscheeks"] [Black "Vierjoki, Timo"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "D00"] [WhiteElo "1395"] [BlackElo "1674"] [Annotator "Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT (30s), TV"] [PlyCount "44"] [EventDate "2011.??.??"] 1. Nf3 d5 2. d4 Nf6 {Queen Pawn Game: Symmetrical Variation} 3. Nc3 (3. Bf4 c5 4. e3 Qb6 5. Nc3 {London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation}) (3. Bg5 e6 4. e3 c5 5. c3 Qb6 {Queen Pawn Game: Torre Attack. Breyer Variation}) 3... c6 {D00 1.d4 d5: Unusual lines} 4. h3 Nbd7 (4... h6 5. e3 (5. Ne5 Bf5 6. e3 Nbd7 7. Nxd7 Qxd7 8. Bd3 Bxd3 9. cxd3 Qd8 10. O-O e6 11. a3 Be7 12. Kh1 O-O 13. Qe2 Re8 14. Bd2 Qb6 15. f4 Bf8 16. b4 a6 17. g4 Nh7 18. Rac1 Qd8 19. Qf2 Be7 {Minshull,G (115)-Saravanan,A (100) London 2015 1/2-1/2 (64)}) 5... Nbd7 6. Be2 Qc7 7. O-O e5 8. dxe5 Nxe5 9. Nxe5 Qxe5 10. f4 Qc7 11. Bf3 Bc5 12. Kh1 Bf5 13. Na4 Bd6 14. Bg4 Bxg4 15. hxg4 Ne4 16. Qf3 O-O-O 17. Nc3 Nxc3 18. bxc3 Rde8 19. Bd2 { Skoblar,M-Blazeka,M (2318) Sveti Filip i Jakov 2014 0-1 (52)}) 5. Bg5 $146 (5. e3 e6 6. a3 c5 7. Bb5 a6 8. Be2 Be7 9. Bd2 O-O 10. g4 cxd4 11. exd4 Qc7 12. g5 Nh5 13. Rg1 Nf4 14. Bxf4 Qxf4 15. Rg4 Qc7 16. Bd3 f5 17. Rh4 b5 18. Qc1 Bb7 19. Ne2 e5 {Sengbusch,G-Gebel,R Pinneberg 2001 1/2-1/2 (60)}) 5... Qc7 6. Ne5 (6. e3 $142 $5 $11 {would keep White in the game}) 6... Nxe5 $17 7. dxe5 Qxe5 8. f4 (8. Qd2 Qd6 9. O-O-O h6 10. Bxf6 Qxf6 $17) 8... Qe3 9. Bxf6 $4 {White crumbles in face of a dire situation} (9. Qd3 $142 Qxd3 10. exd3 $19) 9... exf6 (9... Qg3+ {seems even better} 10. Kd2 gxf6 11. e3 $19) 10. Qd2 (10. Qd3 {a fruitless try to alter the course of the game} Qxf4 11. g3 Qe5 $19) 10... Qg3+ 11. Kd1 Bc5 12. a3 (12. e4 {the last chance for counterplay} Be3 13. Qe1 Qxf4 14. Bd3 $19) 12... Be3 13. Qd3 Qxf4 14. Nb1 (14. g3 {cannot change destiny} Qe5 15. Bg2 Bf5 $19) 14... Bf5 {Black prepares the advance d4} 15. Qc3 Qg3 (15... a5 $142 $5 {might be the shorter path} 16. h4 $19) 16. Nd2 O-O 17. Nf3 d4 $1 { Decoy: d4} 18. Nxd4 (18. Nxd4 Rad8 {Decoy Discovered attack}) (18. Z0 $140 dxc3 {Mate threat}) 18... Rad8 19. Rc1 (19. a4 {doesn't change anything anymore} Rxd4+ 20. Qxd4 Bxd4 21. Ra3 Qxa3 22. e4 Qb4 23. c3 Bxc3 24. bxc3 Qxe4 25. Bc4 Rd8+ 26. Bd3 Qxd3+ 27. Ke1 Qe3+ 28. Kf1 Bd3#) 19... Rxd4+ 20. Qxd4 (20. Qd3 { is no salvation} Rfd8 21. b3 Qf2 22. g3 Rxd3+ 23. cxd3 Bxd3 24. Rc3 Be4+ 25. Rd3 Bxd3 26. a4 Be4#) 20... Bxd4 21. c3 (21. e4 {hardly improves anything} Be3 22. c3 Qf2 23. Be2 Bxe4 24. Rc2 Rd8+ 25. Rd2 Rxd2+ 26. Kc1 Rd5#) 21... Be3 22. Ra1 (22. Rc2 {is not the saving move} Rd8+ 23. Rd2 Rxd2+ 24. Kc1 Rd5#) 22... Rd8# 0-1 [Event "Let's Play!"] [Site "Chess.com"] [Date "2010.12.05"] [Round "?"] [White "kirez"] [Black "Vierjoki, Timo"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "D00"] [WhiteElo "1677"] [BlackElo "1893"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.10 (30s)"] [PlyCount "56"] [EventDate "2010.??.??"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nc3 d5 3. Nf3 c6 {D00 1.d4 d5: Unusual lines} 4. Bf4 e6 5. e3 (5. a3 Be7 6. e3 O-O 7. Bd3 Nbd7 8. O-O Re8 9. Qd2 c5 10. h3 a6 11. Be5 Rf8 12. Bh2 c4 13. Be2 Ne8 14. e4 Ndf6 15. e5 Nd7 16. Ne1 f6 17. f4 fxe5 18. fxe5 g6 19. Nf3 Ng7 {Zlatanovic,S (1482)-Papler,P (1613) Nova Gorica 2015 0-1 (42)}) 5... Bd6 {LiveBook: 4 Games} 6. Bxd6 $146 (6. Bg3 O-O 7. Bd3 Qc7 8. O-O Nbd7 9. Qd2 e5 10. dxe5 Nxe5 11. Nxe5 Bxe5 12. Bxe5 Qxe5 13. f4 Qh5 14. e4 dxe4 15. Nxe4 Nxe4 16. Bxe4 Qc5+ 17. Kh1 f5 18. Bd3 Be6 19. Rf3 Bd5 20. Rg3 Qd4 {Bikady, L-Witt,H (1668) Maastricht 2013 1/2-1/2}) (6. Bd3 O-O 7. O-O Bxf4 8. exf4 b6 9. Ne5 c5 10. Qf3 Ba6 11. Rfe1 Qc8 12. Rac1 Bxd3 13. cxd3 Qa6 14. a3 Nbd7 15. g4 cxd4 16. Ne2 Nxe5 17. fxe5 Nd7 18. Nxd4 Qa4 19. Qf4 Nc5 20. Rcd1 Rac8 {Emodi,G (2311)-Dragomirescu,R (2342) Timisoara 2009 0-1 (39)}) (6. Be5 Bxe5 7. Nxe5 Nbd7 8. Nf3 O-O 9. Bd3 a6 10. Ne2 b5 11. a3 c5 12. c3 Re8 13. Ne5 Nxe5 14. dxe5 Ng4 15. Qc2 g6 16. Nf4 Nxe5 17. Be2 Qf6 18. h4 Bb7 19. g4 d4 20. Rh3 dxe3 { Rufo Yebra,B (1572)-Osorio Ramos,F (1786) Madrid 2014 0-1 (53)}) 6... Qxd6 7. Bd3 Nbd7 8. O-O {The position is equal.} e5 {[#] Threatens to win with ...e4.} 9. dxe5 Nxe5 10. Nxe5 Qxe5 11. h3 O-O 12. Re1 Qg5 13. Qf3 Be6 14. e4 dxe4 15. Nxe4 Nxe4 16. Bxe4 Rad8 17. Rad1 Qa5 18. a3 Qb5 19. b4 Bc4 {0.53/27} (19... Rxd1 $11 {0.00/33} 20. Qxd1 a5) 20. Re3 a5 21. c3 $40 {White mounts an attack.} axb4 22. axb4 Qa4 {0.86/31} (22... Rxd1+ $11 {0.11/28} 23. Qxd1 Be6) 23. Ree1 { 0.07/29} (23. Rxd8 $16 {0.86/31 White threatens Bxh7+! and mate.} Rxd8 24. Bxh7+ $1 Kxh7 25. Qe4+ Kg8 26. Qxc4) 23... Bb3 24. Rc1 Rd6 {0.57/28} ({Black should play} 24... g6 $11 {0.00/28}) 25. Bd3 {0.11/30} (25. Qg3 $14 {0.57/28 feels stronger.} Rd7 26. Bf5) 25... Be6 26. Qh5 $2 {-5.00/28 [#]} (26. Ra1 $11 {0.22/29} Qb3 27. Ra7) 26... Rxd3 $19 27. Re4 Qa3 28. Qc5 Qxc1+ {Accuracy: White = 28%, Black = 18%.} 0-1

This time only one reference game as there was only two games played by players who were rated over 2500. I left out the other game because it was a short draw.

[Event "Nancy Meurthe KO 11th"] [Site "Nancy"] [Date "2013.03.10"] [Round "1.2"] [White "Hamdouchi, Hicham"] [Black "Tkachiev, Vladislav"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "D00"] [WhiteElo "2602"] [BlackElo "2644"] [PlyCount "29"] [EventDate "2013.03.10"] [EventType "k.o. (rapid)"] [EventRounds "4"] [EventCountry "FRA"] [SourceTitle "CBM 153 Extra"] [Source "ChessBase"] [SourceDate "2013.04.22"] 1. Nc3 Nf6 2. Nf3 d5 3. d4 c6 4. Bf4 Qb6 5. Na4 Qa5+ 6. c3 g6 7. Nc5 Nbd7 8. Nb3 Qb6 9. h3 Bg7 10. e3 c5 11. dxc5 Nxc5 12. Be5 Na4 13. Bd4 Qc7 14. Nbd2 Nxc3 15. bxc3 0-1