18 Sept 2015

A09 Réti Opening: 1.Nf3 d5 2.c4 (1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3 c5 5.Bxc4)

A09 Réti Opening: 1.Nf3 d5 2.c4 (1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3 c5 5.Bxc4)

The game shown below was played in a team match called I Tournament of teams: standings - I, round 3. This is played on 91 boards between Три Богатыря (East Slavs) and Kopaonik. I am playing on board 31 for Kopaonik. The current score in the match is 72.5 - 102.5 in favor of Kopaonik, so we have secured the win in this match quite comfortably. There has been quite many timeouts in this match, our opponent has 25 games lost due to timeouts, our team has lost 12 games on time. More unfortunate is the fact that both teams have one player with the cheating badge next to their username. I think the game below is quite well played game by both players for the most part anyway, I made two inaccuracies that could have been taken advantage of by my opponent so that I would have likely lost. Luckily for me, my opponent did not play the best responses to my mistakes and if I consider this game as a whole, I have to be glad about the draw because win was never really in my grasp.

[Event "I Tournament of teams: standings - I, r"] [Site "Chess.com"] [Date "2015.03.25"] [Round "?"] [White "lybaedik"] [Black "Vierjoki, Timo"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A09"] [WhiteElo "1726"] [BlackElo "1902"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.10 (30s), TV"] [PlyCount "124"] [EventDate "2015.??.??"] {[%evp 9,124,31,28,-7,-6,-2,80,27,28,-3,33,20,16,15,60,0,37,16,61,24,20,19,24, 32,37,32,37,36,35,18,21,0,14,1,17,0,-1,0,29,0,14,12,12,2,20,20,11,0,16,0,7,7, 17,19,17,15,27,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0, 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,38,61,168,0,8,0,38,0,0,0,38,38,38,0,0,0,0,0,0]} 1. d4 d5 2. c4 dxc4 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. e3 {D25 Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation} c5 5. Bxc4 {A09 Réti Opening: 1.Nf3 d5 2.c4} cxd4 {LiveBook: 30 Games} 6. Nxd4 e5 7. Nb5 Qxd1+ (7... Bb4+ {is more complex.} 8. N1c3 a6 9. Qxd8+ Kxd8 10. Na3 Be6) 8. Kxd1 {White is better.} Na6 9. Bd2 Be7 $146 (9... Ne4 10. Ke2 Nxd2 11. Nxd2 Be7 12. Ne4 O-O 13. Rhd1 Nc5 14. Nxc5 Bxc5 15. Nd6 Bb6 16. Bd5 Rb8 17. Rac1 Ba5 18. Nxc8 Rfxc8 19. Bxb7 Rxc1 20. Rxc1 g6 21. Rc8+ Rxc8 22. Bxc8 Kg7 23. e4 h5 24. h3 {Kovacs,A (2005)-Horvath,L (2180) Hungary 2008 1/2-1/2 (45)}) 10. Bc3 Nd7 11. Nd2 {[%tqu "En","","","","f7f6","", 10]} O-O {0.60/24} (11... f6 $1 $11 {0.15/28}) 12. a3 {0.00/27} (12. Ke2 $14 {0.60/24}) 12... Nac5 13. Ke2 (13. Nc7 {seems wilder.} Rb8 14. Nd5 Bd8 15. Ke2 b5 16. Ba2) 13... Na4 {0.61/24} (13... Rd8 $11 {0.16/28}) 14. Rac1 (14. Bb4 {keeps more tension.} Nac5 15. Nc7 Rb8 16. Ne4 b6 17. Nd5) 14... Nxc3+ 15. Nxc3 Nb6 16. Bb3 Bd7 17. Rhd1 Bc6 18. Nf3 Bf6 19. e4 Rad8 20. Nd2 Bg5 21. Rc2 Rd7 22. Nc4 Nxc4 23. Bxc4 Rfd8 {[#] ...Rxd1 is the strong threat.} (23... Rc8 {with more complications.} 24. Rxd7 Bxd7 25. b3 Kf8 26. a4 Be7) 24. Rxd7 Rxd7 25. f3 Kf8 26. Bd5 Rd6 27. b4 a6 28. Kd3 Ke7 29. Kc4 b5+ 30. Kb3 f6 31. Bxc6 Rxc6 $11 {[%mdl 4096] Endgame KRB-KRN} 32. Nd5+ Kd7 33. Rxc6 Kxc6 {KB-KN} 34. Ne7+ Kd7 35. Nf5 g6 36. Ng3 Ke6 37. Ne2 f5 38. Nc3 Be3 39. Nd5 Bg1 40. h3 Kd6 41. a4 Bd4 42. Nf6 h6 43. g4 fxg4 44. fxg4 Bb6 45. Nd5 Bd8 46. Nc3 bxa4+ 47. Kxa4 Ke6 48. Nd5 h5 49. Kb3 Kd6 50. Kc4 Bg5 51. Nb6 Kc6 52. Na4 {aiming for Nc5.} Be3 53. Nc3 Bd4 54. Nd5 {[%tqu "En","","","", "h5g4","",10]} Kd6 {1.68/44} (54... hxg4 $1 $14 {0.61/47} 55. hxg4 g5) 55. Nf6 $2 {0.00/46} (55. gxh5 $1 $18 {1.68/44 White threatens h6 and mate.} gxh5 56. Kb3) 55... hxg4 56. hxg4 Kc6 57. Ne8 Be3 {[#] And now .. .Bg5 would win.} 58. Nf6 Bd4 59. Nd5 Kd6 60. Nc3 Be3 {The position is equal.} 61. Na4 Bd4 62. Nc3 Be3 {Accuracy: White = 46%, Black = 48%.} 1/2-1/2

No comments:

Post a Comment