5 Oct 2017

A00 Irregular Openings (1.b4 e5 2.Bb2 Bxb4 3.Bxe5 Nf6 4.e3 Nc6 5.Bb2 d5)

A00 Irregular Openings (1.b4 e5 2.Bb2 Bxb4 3.Bxe5 Nf6 4.e3 Nc6 5.Bb2 d5)

The game below was played in a team match called Mount Doom. The match consisted of 30 boards and it was played between Lord Of The Rings and Equipo Latinoamérica. I played on board 3 for Lord Of The Rings and unfortunately I lost both of my games against alfito2012. Those losses were quite meaningful because of the otherwise evenly played match. The match ended with a score 28.5 - 31.5.

The first 17 moves featured only small mistakes, but the evaluation after 9.h3 is a bit unclear, depending how deep in the analysis I allow the engine to go to, the evaluation is either slightly better or clearly better to me. I do have the better pawn structure, which I thought should work in my favor. After 18.Nd4 I have a decision to make and unfortunately for me, I made the wrong one. I had a chance to trade the knights, defend the knight with Bd7 or Qd7 or move the knight away, I chose to move the knight to e5, which tactically loses a pawn, like shown in game. I did not like the idea of trading the knights because then my opponent would have likely taken back with the c-pawn and improved his pawn structure. Maybe I should have played Bd7, because it would have kept the pawn structure the same and if alfito2012 would have taken my knight on c6, then I could just happily take back with my bishop and I think my bishop should be well placed at c6. After the game move 18...Ne5 my position falls apart and despite of my best efforts, I was unable to recover from the loss of the pawn. Actually the engine thinks that the move 18...Ne5 is actually the best move in the position and the loss of the pawn should not be all that bad for me. However, to my human eyes this does not look like a comfortable situation for me to be in. I guess the better pawn structure and the fact that my pieces are better than my opponent's give me enough compensation for the pawn. The bishop on b2, for example, seems to be very bad compared to its counterpart on b6.

My best chance was to take on e3 with the rook on move 27.

The move that threw my position overboard was 27...Rad8 and the position went even worse for me with my next move 28...Qe7. After my 28th move the game is completely lost. I should really look for tactical possibilities harder than I have in every position because the move 27...Rxe3 is something that I might have seen in my younger days when I was more tactically aware than I am now.

Game number two. This was played in a team match called Kristina Fans VS Limitless Chess on 51 boards. It was played between Bergersen and Kristina Fans and Limitless Chess. I played on board 15 for Limitless Chess and won both my games on time because my opponent's account was closed due to cheating. The match ended with a score of 59.5 - 42.5 in favor of Bergersen and Kristina Fans. I was able to keep the game evenly fought until I played 17...Nd7, which started my final downfall.

My best chance to keep the game evenly fought was to play 17...Bxd3.

During the remainder of the game my position only went worse and I was quite lost in the final position, even though material was even.

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultElo
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.b4 e5 2.Bb2 Bxb4 3.Bxe5 Nf6 4.e3 Nc6 5.Bb2 d5 A00 Irregular Openings 6.a3 Ba5N 6...Bd6 7.Nf3 7.d4 0-0 8.Nd2 8.Bd3 Re8 9.Nf3 Ne7 10.Nbd2 Ng6 11.Bxg6 hxg6 12.0-0 Ne4 13.Ne1 Qh4 14.f4 Qh6 15.Nef3 Bg4 16.Qc1 f6 17.Nxe4 dxe4 18.Nd2 c6 19.Rf2 g5 20.Nf1 gxf4 21.exf4 e3 22.Nxe3 Bxf4 Molano Lafuente, I (1994)-Castillo Martinez,E (1878) Llinars del Valles 2013 1/2-1/2 (70) 8...Re8 9.c4 Be6 10.c5 Bf8 11.Bb5 Bd7 12.Ne2 Ng4 13.0-0 g6 14.h3 Nf6 15.Bd3 Bh6 16.Ng3 Ne7 17.Qc2 Qc8 18.Kh2 Nf5 19.Nxf5 gxf5 20.Nf3 Ne4 21.Rae1 c6 Pettersson,O (1997)-Hjelle,O (1357) Oslo 2014 1-0 (43) 7...a6 8.c4 0-0 9.Nc3 dxc4 10.Bxc4 Na5 11.Ba2 c5 12.0-0 Bg4 13.h3 Bh5 14.a4 c4 15.Rc1 Rc8 16.Nb1 Qe7 17.Bc3 Bb4 18.Bxb4 Qxb4 19.Nc3 Rfd8 20.g4 Bg6 21.Ne5 Schneider,T-Gutmann,M Zell 1993 1/2-1/2 6...Be7 7.Nf3 0-0 8.Be2 Bg4 9.0-0 Re8 10.c4 Ne4 11.cxd5 Qxd5 12.d3 Bf6 13.Bxf6 Nxf6 14.Nbd2 Rad8 15.d4 Na5 16.Qa4 b6 17.Rac1 Qb7 18.Qc2 Re7 19.Bd3 h5 20.Ne5 c5 21.Ndf3 Nemeth,L (2061)-Chirila,I (2183) Gyongyos 2003 0-1 (35) 7.Bb5 Bd7 8.Qe2 8.Nf3= should be considered. 8...0-0 9.h3 9.Nf3 9...a6 10.Bd3 Re8 11.Nf3 Bb6 12.0-0 Ne4 13.Nc3 Nxc3 13...Bf5 14.Bxc3= d4
Find the correct move
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBRes
alfito20121836Vierjoki,T18321–0
Unix731874Vierjoki,T18170–1
Trelawney1596Vierjoki,T15340–1

No comments:

Post a Comment