The blog features analysed games of mine, consisting of chess, chess960 and 3 check. There are also puzzles that you can solve by moving the pieces on the board and the solution can be checked by using the engine provided by the ChessBase's publishing tool. All games and puzzles can be downloaded for free!
The first big mistake of this game was seen when I chose to play 14.Ne1. It was another passive move that could have cost me one of my games. Not sure what I thought would happen in case I move my knight to g5, maybe I thought it would be lost, but once again, I would have been wrong. There would not have been any way for my opponent to take advantage of the knight on g5, the knight would have threatened a fork on f7 and because Gluecifer7 would have needed to protect f7, I would have had time to protect my knight. Retreating with the knight to e1 hampered the coordination of my pieces, my rooks were not connected anymore.
The only good move is 14.Ng5, according to Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT at depth 34.
In order to take advantage of my blunder, Gluecifer7 should have replied with 14...Nxe5 and the continuation 15.dxe5 Qe4 does not look good for me as all of my pieces would be badly placed. Luckily for me, Gluecifer7 played 14...Rh6 for some reason that I do not fully understand, maybe it was only made so that the knight on f6 could move freely again. It did not take long for me to blunder again, with my 16th move Qe3, my position went down the drain again.
16.Bxf6 is the move that the engine recommends at depth 40.
It did not matter, however, because Gluecifer7 was not able to find a strong move in reply. Both 16...h3 and 16...Nxe5 would have meant huge problems for me, but Gluecifer7 played 16...Rdh8, which let me off the hook as it only defends the rook on h6 instead of going for the attack. I continued the game with 17.c4, which basically forced the queen to retreat, since 17...Qe4 is answered with 18.Qxe4 Nxe4 19.Bxh8. My opponent went all the way back to d8 with the queen, which was one square too far as it made the reply 18.Nb5 look a bit more annoying. Gluecifer7 thought it best to protect the c7 pawn with 18...Bd6 and had I taken on d6 with my bishop, I could remained on the clearly favorable side of the board, since I would have been the one with the initiative. The problem with Nxd6 was that after cxd6 I could not play Qf4 and thus increased pressure towards d6. In the game I had to move my bishop and I chose to move it to f4, which was better than taking on f6. My final mistake saw the light of day when I played 26.Qd2.
My best try was 26.Qe4, according to Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT at depth 34.
The queen moved out of the defence and in an awkward square that the reply 26...Nd4 would have taken advantage of. In some situations the knight would have threatened to go to f3 and fork the queen and king, though it probably does not quite work immediately. In the game Gluecifer7 chose to play 26...h3, to which I replied by moving my g-pawn one square forward. It left the square f3 unprotected so naturally my opponent continued with 27...Nd4. The game did not last long after that as I resigned after 29...Qe4.
New ...
New Game
Edit Game
Setup Position
Open...
PGN
FEN
Share...
Share Board (.png)
Share Board (configure)
Share playable board
Share game as GIF
Notation (PGN)
QR Code
Layout...
Use splitters
Swipe notation/lists
Reading mode
Flip Board
Settings
Move
N
Result
Elo
Replay and check the LiveBook here
Please, wait...
1.e4d52.exd5Nf63.d4Bg44.Be2Bxe25.Qxe2Qxd56.Nf3e67.0-0Nc68.c30-0-0B01 Scandinavian Defence8...Bd69.b4Qh510.Re10-011.b5Ne712.c4Nf513.Bb2c514.bxc6bxc615.Ne5Qxe216.Rxe2c517.dxc5Bxc518.Ba3Rfd819.g4Rd1+20.Kg2Bxa321.gxf5exf522.Rd2Rxd223.Nxd2Bak,A
(2048)-Mulleady,P (1912) England 2015 1/2-1/2 (37)9.Bg59.Be3Bd610.Nbd2Qh511.h3e512.dxe5Nxe513.Rfe1Nd314.Reb1Rhe815.Nc4Nf416.Nxd6+Rxd617.Qc4Nxh3+18.Kf1Re419.Qc5Nf420.Qxh5N4xh521.Rd1Rxd1+22.Rxd1Nd723.Ng5Re7Laznicka,V (2480)-Krivoshey,S (2493) playchess.com
INT 2005 1-0 (45)9...h610.Bh4N10.Bxf6gxf611.Nbd2h512.b4h413.h3Bh614.Ne4f515.Nc5Rdg816.Nd3Rh717.Nde1Bf418.a4Ne719.c4Qe420.Qxe4fxe421.Ne5e322.N1d3exf2+23.Kxf2Bg3+1/2-1/2 (23)
Stergar,L (1738)-Schaefer,H (2042) Goch 199710.Bxf6!?gxf611.Nbd2=10...g5Black threatens to win material: g5xh411.Bg3h512.Be5
White threatens to win material: Be5xf6Be713.Na3g4Black threatens to
win material: g4xf314.Ne1?14.Ng5Rhg815.Bxf6Bxf616.Nxf7Rd7=14...Rh6??Black loses the upper hand14...Nxe5Black clearly has
the better chances15.dxe5Qe4-+15.Nd315.Nc4Rg8=15...h415...Bxa316.bxa3Qc416.Qe3?16.Bxf6Rxf617.Qxg4Bxa318.bxa3=16...Rdh8??not a good decision, because now the opponent is
right back in the game16...Nxe5Black would have gained the upper
hand17.Qxe5Bxa318.bxa3h3-+17.c4Qd817...Qd7!?is
worth consideration18.Nb5±Bd619.Nxd6+19.Bxd6!?cxd620.Qf4±19...cxd6=20.Bf4White threatens to win material: Bf4xh6Rg620...Rh521.Rfd1=21.b421.Rac1a521...Ne721...Kb822.Bg5??letting the wind out of his own sails22.d5would allow
White to play onKb823.dxe6±22...Nf523.Qf4Rh523...g324.h3Rhg825.Bxf6Qxf626.Rad1gxf2+27.Rxf224.Bxf6Qxf625.d5e526.Qd2??leads to further unpleasantness26.Qe4Nd427.Rad126...h326...Nd4!?keeps an even firmer grip27.Qe3h328.g3-+27.g3Nd428.Qd1??simply worsens the situation28.f4gxf329.Kh1-+28...Qf5-+29.Rb129.Kh1what else?Nc2‼Deflection: f330.Rc1-+29...Qe429...Qe430.f3Nxf3+31.Rxf3Rf5-+0–1
No comments:
Post a Comment