The blog features analysed games of mine, consisting of chess, chess960 and 3 check. There are also puzzles that you can solve by moving the pieces on the board and the solution can be checked by using the engine provided by the ChessBase's publishing tool. All games and puzzles can be downloaded for free!
The game I am sharing today was played in a team match called Carpe Diem 4th Birthday Celebration Match and it was played between Carpe Diem and Battle For Victory on 99 boards. I played on board 29 for Battle For Victory and unfortunately lost both my games against kamabarus. However, even if I had won both my games, the winner of the match would have still been Carpe Diem as they won the match with a score of 105 - 93. The first move that may be criticized is 17.Ne5. The move seems, at first, like a good one, it blocks the rooks path, so that it does not protect the pawn on e4 anymore and it also attacks the pawn on c6. However, the pawn on e4 can't actually be taken with the bishop in view of the move f6 and my opponent would pay a heavy price for the pawn. The pawn on c6 is not really under a serious attack either, due to the continuation 18.Nxc6 Bxc6 19.Rxc6 Nb4 and my opponent would need to give back the pawn or lose the rook.
Better options for kamabarus were, for instance, 17.Qc2 and 17.Ba3, according to Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT at depth 37.
In the game I should have played 17...f6, but for some reason I thought that 17...e3 had more potential, so I chose that one instead. Obviously 18.fxe3 is unplayable because of the reply 18...Nxe3, forking the queen and the rook. While these are some improvements to the game continuation, neither 17.Ne5 or 17...e3 were horrible enough moves that the game should have been decided because of those two moves. The first move that could have been responsible for my loss was 19...c5.
My best chance to keep the position equal was to play 19...f6, according to the engine at depth 32.
It seemed logical to me to open the bishop's path, so that it would not seem like a tall pawn anymore, but because the bishop was not defended at b7, it meant that the knight on d5 could not safely move anywhere. This fact kamarabus tried to use to his or hers advantage. My opponent correctly played 20.dxc5, but then quickly lost the right path and I managed to equalize couple of moves later. The game continued 20...Bxc5 21.Qf5 Qe7 22.Qg4 Nf6 and I had successfully been able to get away from the pin on the long diagonal. Bad moves continued from both sides, but the game losing blunder came from me, when I played the horrible 24...Rxe7. On the previous move I had self pinned my knight again...
The only playable move was 24...Bxe7, all other moves seem to be losing.
The reason why 24...Rxe7 was so bad is that it lost a piece by force, due to my badly placed pieces. Kamarabus was able to take advantage of my horrible position and played 25.b4. The position was quite resignable at that moment, but for some reason I liked to torture myself a few moves longer and only resigned after 29.Nc6 in a position where I would lose either a bishop or the exchange. Either way I would have been completely lost, since I was already down a knight for a pawn.
New ...
New Game
Edit Game
Setup Position
Open...
PGN
FEN
Share...
Share Board (.png)
Share Board (configure)
Share playable board
Share game as GIF
Notation (PGN)
QR Code
Layout...
Use splitters
Swipe notation/lists
Reading mode
Flip Board
Settings
Move
N
Result
Elo
Replay and check the LiveBook here
Please, wait...
1.d4Nf62.c4e63.Nf3b64.g3Bb75.Bg2Be76.0-00-07.Nc3d58.b3Nbd79.Bb2E17 Queen's Indian: 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7Re810.Rc110.e3c511.Ne5cxd412.exd4Rc813.Rc1Bd614.Qe2a615.f4Rc716.g4Bb417.g5Bxc318.Rxc3Ne419.Rh3Nf820.Bxe4dxe421.Qh5b522.Rc1bxc423.bxc4e324.Rxe3Ree7Hebert,J (2422)-Nogueiras Santiago,J (2521) Montreal 2003 1/2-1/2
(58)10...Bf8N10...c511.cxd5exd511...Nxd512.Qd2Nxc313.Bxc3Bf614.Rfd1cxd415.Bxd4Bxd416.Qxd4Nc517.Qf4Qf618.Qxf6gxf619.Nd4Bxg220.Kxg2Rad821.Nc6Rxd122.Rxd1a523.f3Kf824.Kf2Rc825.Na7Rc726.Nb5Ferrara,A (2155)-Castelli,R (2200) Buenos Aires 1997 1/2-1/212.e3Rc813.Qd3c414.bxc4Ba615.Nd2dxc416.Qb1b517.a3Qb618.Rfd1Bb719.Bxb7Qxb720.Qf5g621.Qxb5Qxb522.Nxb5Rb823.Nxa7Rxb224.Nxc4Rb325.a4Molvig,J (1964)-Skjoldager,P (2160) Helsingor 2016 1/2-1/2 (43)10...Rc811.Ne5Nf812.e3c513.Ne2Rc714.Rc2Bd615.Nf4Bxe516.dxe5N6d717.cxd5exd518.Nxd5Bxd519.Qxd5Ng620.Rd1Qe721.f4Nb822.Bh3Nc623.Bc3h524.Rcd2h425.Bd7Molteni,C (1950)-Cattaneo,D (1508) Bergamo 2006
1-0 (39)11.cxd5exd512.Nb5White threatens to win material: Nb5xc7c6
Black threatens to win material: c6xb513.Nc3Ne414.Nxe4dxe4Inferior is
14...Rxe415.Ne5Nxe516.Bxe4dxe417.dxe5±15.Nd2Nf616.Nc4Nd5
Black intends e3. The knight is not easily driven from d517.Ne5White
threatens to win material: Ne5xc617.f3e318.f4=17...e3??
gives the opponent counterplay17...f618.Nc418.f418.Qd3Qe7±18...Rc818...f619.Nd3≤19.Nxc6Qd720.Ne5fxe521.dxe5Rad819.Qd319.Qc219...c5??a transit from better to worse19...f6was a good chance to save the game20.Nc4b5=20.dxc5+-Bxc521.Qf521.Rfd1and White can celebrate victoryNxf422.Qc4+-21...Qe7±22.Qg422.Ng4Qe623.Qxe6fxe624.f5±22...Nf6=Black threatens to win material: Nf6xg423.Qg523.Qh3=23...Ne4??Black is ruining his position23...h624.Qf5Bxg225.Kxg2Rcd824.Qxe7White has a mate threatRxe7??24...Bxe7this is
the best bet to save the position25.Bd4f626.Rxc8Rxc825.b4!+-Decoy: b4Bxb425...f626.Bxe4Bxe427.Nf3+-27.bxc5?!is the less
attractive alternativefxe528.cxb6Rxc129.Rxc1axb6±26.Rxc8+Bxc827.Bxe4f627...Rc7doesn't get the bull off the ice28.Rd1Bd229.Nf3+-28.Bd5+28.Rd1!?might be the shorter pathKf829.Rd8+Re830.Rxe8+Kxe8+-28...Kf828...Be6is the last straw29.Bxe6+Rxe6+-29.Nc629.Nc6Bc530.Nxe7Kxe731.Kg2+-1–0
No comments:
Post a Comment