C58 Two Knights: 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Na5 sidelines (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Na5 6.Qe2)

There are many things that I do not understand in this world and one of them is quite often discussed by chess players on a correspondence chess site. Some players don't seem to like that the game can last a long time but still they are playing correspondence chess (covers his head with his palm)... I mean there are quicker ways to play a game of chess from start to finish if that is what matters to you. There is one tournament where I play that has 14 days per move and some have dropped out of it because it has started to take too long to finish the games. So when they entered the tournament the thought of how long it could possibly take did not even cross their minds, I just do not understand these people. I do not have anything against these people of course they can do whatever they like and maybe next time they consider about the possible length before they join... I have never personally had anything against these very long thinking times. I even play in a tournament that has 21 days per move and 21 days in the bank. And probably vacation time also allowed though with those times, you would never need to have vacation time in addition to the game time. I have added a few more mate in ones and twos today.

[Event "AUTO-OPEN-2232"] [Site "http://www.queenalice.com/gam"] [Date "2011.01.17"] [Round "1"] [White "Wattsy"] [Black "Vierjoki, Timo"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "C58"] [WhiteElo "1465"] [BlackElo "2014"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.10 (5s), TV"] [PlyCount "54"] [EventDate "2011.??.??"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Na5 {C57 Italian Game: Two Knights Defense. Polerio Defense} 6. Qe2 {-0.73/20 C58 Two Knights: 4.Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Na5 sidelines} (6. Bb5+ $11 {0.22/20 remains equal.} c6 7. dxc6 bxc6 8. Qf3) 6... Nxc4 $17 7. Qxc4 Nxd5 8. Nc3 c6 {Black is slightly better.} (8... Nxc3 9. Qxf7# {1-0 (9) Kloeditz,D-Kern,A Landau 2018}) 9. O-O {-1.88/18} (9. d4 $15 {-0.44/18}) (9. Nxd5 cxd5 10. Qb5+ Qd7 11. Qxd7+ Bxd7 12. d3 f6 13. Nf3 Bc6 14. O-O Bd6 15. b3 O-O 16. Bb2 Rac8 17. Rac1 Rc7 18. Rfe1 Rfc8 19. Nd2 d4 20. Nc4 Bb4 21. c3 dxc3 22. Bxc3 Bxc3 23. Rxc3 Be8 {Doan,D-Nguyen,H Vietnam 2002 1/ 2-1/2 (42)}) 9... Qxg5 $19 10. Nxd5 $146 (10. d3 Qd8 11. Nxd5 Qxd5 12. Qc3 Bd6 13. Re1 O-O 14. Qd2 Re8 15. d4 Bd7 16. Qg5 exd4 17. Qd2 Rxe1+ 18. Qxe1 Re8 19. Qf1 Bb4 20. Be3 dxe3 21. fxe3 Rxe3 22. c3 Bc5 23. Kh1 Rg3 24. hxg3 Qh5# { Windjaeger,G (902)-Zimmermann,G Greifswald 2003 0-1}) 10... cxd5 11. Qb5+ Ke7 12. d4 Qg6 {White must now prevent ...Qc6.} 13. dxe5 Qc6 14. Qxc6 {-2.62/14} ( 14. Qd3 $17 {-1.34/19 might work better.}) 14... bxc6 15. Re1 Bf5 16. c3 Kd7 17. Bf4 Bc5 18. b4 Bb6 19. Rad1 a5 {[#] Hoping for ...axb4.} 20. c4 {-5.28/14} (20. a3 $142 {-3.36/20}) 20... axb4 21. cxd5 c5 22. e6+ fxe6 23. dxe6+ Kc6 24. Re5 g6 25. h3 Bc7 {Black is clearly winning.} 26. Re2 {If only White now had time for Bxc7....} Bxf4 27. Rde1 {-9.60/17} (27. g4 $142 {-5.17/18}) 27... Rhe8 {Accuracy: White = 28%, Black = 66%.} 0-1