Don't be fooled by my opponent's low rating in this game. When I got the pgn for this game, I noticed that my adversary's rating was a lot lower than I remembered, so I went to look up at his rating profile which contained very interesting info. He had been over 2200 in 2009 but then his rating had gone down very steeply and dropped over 900 points in total until it raised around 400 points again. Well, after learning that he had been a lot higher rated at some point consistently, made me not feel so bad at losing this game as my opponent does seem to have potential for being a really good chess player. My ratings differ a lot too, depending on the time controls and place where the games are played. Maybe the place is not as important as the different players I am facing that makes my rating be really low in some places and rather high in some other places. I have added four mate in two and one mate in four puzzle today and also added something into Chess basics that I had forgotten to add there before. I had left the explanation of a stalemate out of there for some reason. This of course I remembered maybe last night when I was trying to sleep...
The blog features analysed games of mine, consisting of chess, chess960 and 3 check. There are also puzzles that you can solve by moving the pieces on the board and the solution can be checked by using the engine provided by the ChessBase's publishing tool. All games and puzzles can be downloaded for free!
Dropdowns
31 Jan 2015
B07 Pirc Defence: Miscellaneous Systems (1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Bg5 c6 5.f3 Bg7 6.Qd2)
[Event "Corr game 30.4.2014-9.5.2014"]
[Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"]
[Date "2014.04.30"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Vierjoki, Timo"]
[Black "rjwc22"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B07"]
[WhiteElo "1863"]
[BlackElo "1161"]
[Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.10 (5s), TV"]
[PlyCount "50"]
[EventDate "2014.??.??"]
1. e4 d6 2. d4 Nf6 3. Nc3 g6 4. Bg5 {B07 Pirc Defense: Byrne Variation} c6 (
4... Bg7 5. f3 {1-0 (17) Fletzer,G-Bachmann,P Lausanne 1952} (5. Qd2 c6 {
1-0 (55) Kovacs,D (2071)-Vass,I (2098) Hungary 2008})) 5. f3 Bg7 6. Qd2 {
B07 Pirc Defence: Miscellaneous Systems} O-O (6... h6 7. Be3 b5 8. Bd3 Nbd7 9.
Nge2 Nb6 10. b3 a5 11. a4 b4 12. Nd1 Nfd7 13. c3 e5 14. cxb4 axb4 15. Rc1 Bb7
16. O-O exd4 17. Nxd4 c5 18. Nb5 Nc8 19. Be2 Ra6 20. Nb2 h5 21. Nc4 {
Romanishin,O (2610)-Donner,J (2475) Buenos Aires 1978 1-0}) 7. Bd3 $146 {
-0.44/20} (7. a4 $14 {0.62/17}) (7. g4 Nbd7 8. h4 Qa5 9. h5 e5 10. Nge2 Re8 11.
O-O-O Nb6 12. dxe5 dxe5 13. Ng3 Be6 14. Nf5 Bxa2 15. Nxg7 Kxg7 16. Bxf6+ Kxf6
17. Nd5+ {1-0 (17) Fletzer,G-Bachmann,P Lausanne 1952}) (7. Nge2 b5 8. Bh6 b4
9. Nd1 c5 10. Bxg7 Kxg7 11. Ne3 Nc6 12. d5 Ne5 13. Ng3 a5 14. Be2 h5 15. O-O h4
16. Nh1 Qb6 17. Nf2 Nh5 18. Nf5+ Bxf5 19. exf5 c4 20. Kh1 Rh8 21. f4 c3 {
Kovacs,D (2071)-Vass,I (2098) Hungary 2008 1-0 (55)}) (7. h4 Nh5 8. Nge2 f6 9.
Be3 f5 10. exf5 gxf5 11. O-O-O Qa5 12. Bh6 Bxh6 13. Qxh6 Ng7 14. Qe3 Be6 15. h5
f4 16. Nxf4 Qg5 17. g3 Na6 18. h6 Bf7 19. hxg7 Rfe8 20. Bd3 h5 21. Qe4 e5 {
Brajovic,M (2147)-Ruzicic,M Belgrade 2007 1-0}) 7... e5 {0.65/18} ({Black
should play} 7... Qb6 $15 {-0.44/20}) 8. Nge2 {-0.35/21} (8. d5 $14 {0.65/18})
8... Qb6 {0.75/17} (8... Qc7 $15 {-0.35/21}) 9. Na4 {0.09/22} (9. dxe5 $16 {
0.75/17} dxe5 10. O-O-O) 9... Qc7 {0.61/22} (9... Qd8 $11 {0.09/22}) 10. O-O-O
{-0.85/19} (10. c4 $14 {0.61/22 stays ahead.}) 10... Nbd7 11. g4 {-1.95/21} ({
White should try} 11. h4 $15 {-0.45/20}) 11... b5 12. Nac3 a5 {-0.77/19} (12...
exd4 $19 {-2.20/19 is more deadly.} 13. Nxd4 b4) 13. h4 $17 b4 {-0.34/20} ({
Better is} 13... exd4 $17 {-0.77/19} 14. Nxd4 b4) 14. Na4 $15 c5 {0.63/21} (
14... d5 $15 {-0.62/21}) 15. dxc5 $14 Nxc5 16. Bb5 $2 {-1.25/22 [#]} (16. Nxc5
$16 {0.87/20 And now Na4 would win.} Qxc5 17. h5) 16... Qb7 {-0.10/23} (16...
Rb8 $1 $17 {-1.25/22} 17. Nxc5 Rxb5) 17. Nxc5 {-1.05/22} (17. c4 $11 {-0.10/23
remains equal.}) 17... Qxb5 $17 18. Nd3 $1 Be6 $36 {Hoping for ...Qa4. Black
has the initiative.} 19. Kb1 $1 d5 {-0.79/22} (19... Rfc8 $142 {-1.36/19} 20.
h5 d5 21. Bxf6 Bxf6) 20. exd5 $2 {-3.63/18} (20. Bxf6 $17 {-0.79/22} Bxf6 21.
Ng3) 20... Nxd5 $19 ({Less strong is} 20... Qxd5 21. Nec1 $17) 21. h5 e4 $1 {
[#] aiming for ...Nc3+!} 22. fxe4 $2 {-6.28/18} (22. hxg6 {-3.87/24} exd3 23.
Qxd3 Qxd3 24. gxf7+ Bxf7 25. Rxd3) 22... Nc3+ $1 23. Nxc3 (23. bxc3 bxc3+)
23... bxc3 24. Qf4 {Bf6 would now be nice for White.} cxb2 25. h6 Bxa2+ $1 {
Accuracy: White = 17%, Black = 35%.} 0-1
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment