D30 Queen's Gambit Declined: Systems without Nc3 (1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 c6 4.Nbd2)

I used to play Queen's Gambit Declined in my earliest chess games for couple of years and then I changed my way of answering to 1.d4 to that what I had seen in chess videos by IM Greg Shahade or curtains as he is also known. It was the days when he was posting his videos to ChessVideos.tv, I think I watched every single one of his videos up to the point they became mostly pay to see videos. Later on I found out that he has a YouTube channel Greg Shahade Chess, as I saw that I thought I should subscribe to that because he has some really good videos there and it is a shame that he does not get more views and subscribers. I have to admit though that I haven't been watching those videos for some time but because there does not seem to be any time for it anymore, so many things that I consider to be more important use of my time. I also have not watched Larry Christiansen's Attack with LarryC videos either anymore and I like those as well but there is not enough hours in the day to do all the things I maybe would want to include to my day.

[Event "Let's Play!"] [Site "Chess.com"] [Date "2014.05.25"] [Round "?"] [White "Vierjoki, Timo"] [Black "homeslyyyce"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "D30"] [WhiteElo "1827"] [BlackElo "1629"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.10 (5s), TV"] [PlyCount "77"] [EventDate "2014.??.??"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 {D30 Queen's Gambit Declined} (2... c6 3. Nf3 {1-0 (46) Bronstein,D-Patzl,K Krems 1967}) 3. Nf3 c6 4. Nbd2 {D30 Queen's Gambit Declined: Systems without Nc3} Bb4 5. Qc2 Nf6 6. a3 {0.37/22} (6. e3 $16 { 0.87/17}) 6... Ba5 {1.08/19} (6... Bxd2+ $14 {0.37/22} 7. Bxd2 Nbd7) 7. b4 { 0.60/19} (7. e3 $16 {1.08/19}) 7... Bb6 $146 {1.41/20} (7... Bc7 $14 {0.60/19} 8. e4 dxe4 9. Nxe4 Nbd7 10. Bg5 O-O 11. Be2 Re8 12. Rd1 Qe7 13. O-O b6 14. Nxf6+ gxf6 15. Bh4 Bb7 16. Nd2 Qf8 17. Bf3 Qh6 18. Bg3 Bxg3 19. fxg3 Qe3+ 20. Kh1 Qxa3 21. Ne4 Qxb4 22. c5 Ba6 {Bronstein,D-Patzl,K Krems 1967 1-0 (46)}) 8. Bb2 {0.72/22} ({White should try} 8. a4 {1.41/20}) 8... Nbd7 {1.48/19} (8... a5 $142 {0.72/22}) 9. g3 {0.62/21} (9. a4 $16 {1.48/19}) 9... O-O $14 10. Bg2 Re8 {1.28/19} (10... Bc7 $14 {0.66/21}) 11. O-O {0.75/21} (11. e3 $142 {1.28/19}) 11... h6 {1.37/20} (11... a5 $142 {0.75/21}) 12. Rfe1 Bc7 {1.49/20} (12... a5 $142 {1.00/21}) 13. e4 {0.85/23} ({Better is} 13. Rac1 {1.49/20}) 13... Nb6 { 2.05/22} (13... dxe4 $16 {0.85/23 was worth a try.} 14. Ne5 (14. Nxe4 Nxe4 15. Qxe4 a5 $16) 14... a5) 14. Rad1 {0.79/24} (14. e5 $18 {2.05/22 and White stays clearly on top.}) 14... Bd7 {1.82/22} (14... Nxc4 $16 {0.79/24} 15. Nxc4 dxc4) 15. Ne5 {0.78/23} (15. e5 $18 {1.82/22}) 15... Bxe5 $2 {2.30/18 [#]} (15... a5 $16 {0.78/23}) 16. dxe5 $18 Nh7 17. exd5 {1.12/24} (17. c5 $18 {2.60/21}) 17... cxd5 $16 18. cxd5 Ba4 19. Nb3 {And now d6 would win.} Rc8 20. Qd3 {[#] d6 is the strong threat.} Nc4 $2 {2.97/22} (20... Nxd5 $16 {1.00/23 was called for.} 21. Rd2 (21. Bxd5 Qxd5 22. Qxd5 exd5 $11) 21... Nb6) 21. Bc1 $2 {0.65/21} (21. Ba1 $18 {2.97/22}) 21... b5 $2 {2.78/21} (21... exd5 $14 {0.65/21} 22. f4 (22. Bxd5 Nxe5 23. Qe2 Ng5 $17) 22... Qb6+ 23. Nc5 Bxd1 24. Rxd1 Rxc5 25. bxc5 Qxc5+ 26. Kh1 Rd8) 22. d6 {Hoping for d7.} Rb8 $2 {3.22/19} (22... Nf8 {1.68/22} 23. f4 Nd7) 23. Re2 Nf8 24. Rde1 Bxb3 25. Qxb3 Nd7 26. f4 Qb6+ 27. Be3 Nxe3 28. Rxe3 ({Less strong is} 28. Qxe3 Rec8 $18) 28... Rbc8 29. Kh1 Rc4 30. Rc3 Qf2 { 3.91/20} (30... Qa6 {2.73/25 was necessary.} 31. Rxc4 bxc4) 31. Rf1 $18 Rxc3 { 5.72/19} (31... Qd4 $142 {3.81/26}) 32. Qxc3 {White is clearly winning.} (32. Rxf2 $2 {too greedy.} Rxb3 33. Bc6 Rd8 $19) 32... Qb6 33. Qc6 Qxc6 34. Bxc6 { KRB-KRN} Rd8 35. Bxb5 f6 36. Bxd7 Rxd7 37. Rc1 fxe5 38. fxe5 Rd8 39. Rc7 { Accuracy: White = 30%, Black = 15%.} 1-0