6 Sept 2014

E49 Nimzo-Indian: Rubinstein: 5.Bd3 d5 6.a3 Bxc3+ 7.bxc3 (1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.f3 d5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 O-O 7.e3 b6 8.cxd5 exd5 9.Bd3 Ba6 10.Ne2 Re8 11.O-O Qc8)

E49 Nimzo-Indian: Rubinstein: 5.Bd3 d5 6.a3 Bxc3+ 7.bxc3 (1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.f3 d5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 O-O 7.e3 b6 8.cxd5 exd5 9.Bd3 Ba6 10.Ne2 Re8 11.O-O Qc8)

I wonder if I can get all ECO codes featured in this blog sometime in the far future... My earliest games that I played against Chessmaster 8000 personalities have some very weird opening treatments and me playing like a total beginner, so everything is possible. Even after some 13 or so years that I have studied the game I am still really bad at it. Then again I have maybe gone through one or two chess books and only done some 30-40 hours of tactical training and I have maybe only analysed around 100 or so of my games in those years. So one could say it is no wonder why I still suck at the game. I have played more than 5000 chess games but since I only have looked so little amount of them afterwards, it might be the biggest reason why my rating hasn't changed all that much in years, only my tactical eye has gone worse over the years. This might have something to do with the fact that there has been several months in between any real training on the matter.

[Event "ICC 45 45"] [Site "Internet Chess Club"] [Date "2011.12.18"] [Round "?"] [White "LucaTrapani"] [Black "Vierjoki, Timo"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "E49"] [WhiteElo "1875"] [BlackElo "1831"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.10 (30s), TV"] [PlyCount "57"] [EventDate "2011.??.??"] {[%evp 22,56,47,38,110,120,116,117,124,74,169,157,251,255,230,181,417,302,840, 527,1364,1285,1289,1346,1351,1362,1533,1418,29996,29997,29997,29995,29996, 29995,29996,29997,29999]} 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. f3 {E20 Nimzo-Indian Defense: Kmoch Variation} d5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 O-O 7. e3 b6 8. cxd5 exd5 9. Bd3 Ba6 10. Ne2 Re8 11. O-O Qc8 {E49 Nimzo-Indian: Rubinstein: 5. Bd3 d5 6.a3 Bxc3+ 7.bxc3} (11... Bxd3 12. Qxd3 Nc6 13. Ng3 Qe7 14. Ra2 Na5 15. e4 Qe6 16. Re2 Qc6 17. e5 Nd7 18. f4 Nc4 19. f5 Ndxe5 20. dxe5 Nxe5 21. Qd4 f6 22. Rfe1 Qd7 23. Bf4 c5 24. Qd2 Qd6 25. Bxe5 fxe5 26. Nh5 {Ziegenfuss,A (1937) -Glinzner,A (1799) Willingen 2018 1-0}) 12. Ng3 {LiveBook: 3 Games} Nc6 $146 { 1.10/26} ({Better is} 12... Bxd3 $14 {0.38/26} 13. Qxd3 Qa6 14. Qxa6 (14. Qf5 Qc8 15. Qb1 h5 16. Ra2 c5 17. e4 h4 18. Nf5 dxe4 19. Nd6 Qe6 20. Nxe8 Qxe8 21. Re2 cxd4 22. cxd4 Nc6 23. Bb2 Qd7 24. fxe4 Nxd4 25. Ref2 Qd6 26. Rd1 Ng4 27. Bxd4 Qxh2+ 28. Kf1 Nxf2 {Kovacs,T (2209)-Pirau,H (2160) Aggtelek 2001 1/2-1/2 (44)}) 14... Nxa6) (12... c5 13. Ra2 Bxd3 14. Qxd3 Qa6 15. Qf5 (15. Qxa6 Nxa6 16. Re2 Rac8 17. e4 Nc7 18. Bg5 Nd7 19. Nf5 f6 20. Bf4 Nb5 21. a4 Nxc3 22. Rc2 cxd4 23. Nd6 dxe4 24. fxe4 Nc5 25. Nxc8 Rxc8 26. e5 Nd3 27. exf6 Nxf4 28. f7+ Kf8 29. Rxf4 d3 {Kirszenberg,M (2180)-Atabayev,S (2415) Budapest 2017 0-1 (49)} ) 15... Nc6 16. Raf2 Qc4 17. Qg5 h6 18. Qh4 Ne7 19. e4 cxd4 20. Bxh6 Ng6 21. Qh3 gxh6 22. Qxh6 Re6 23. cxd4 Ne7 24. Qg5+ Kh8 25. e5 Nh7 26. Qf4 Rf8 27. Nh5 {Sengupta,D (2529)-Lalith,B (2585) Kolkata 2014 0-1 (47)}) 13. Bf5 Qd8 14. Re1 {White is better.} Na5 15. Ra2 {0.74/25} (15. e4 $142 {1.24/23}) 15... Nc4 { 1.69/24} (15... Bc4 $16 {0.74/25 was necessary.} 16. Rb2 c5) {[%tqu "En","","", "", "e3e4","",10]} 16. e4 $1 $18 dxe4 {2.51/23} (16... Nd7 $16 {1.57/27} 17. Bg5 (17. exd5 Nd6 $14) 17... Qxg5 18. Bxd7 Reb8) 17. fxe4 {[%mdl 32]} h6 18. e5 Nd5 $2 {4.17/21} (18... Nxe5 {1.81/26 was called for.} 19. dxe5 Qxd1 20. Rxd1 Rxe5) 19. Qg4 {[#] Bxh6 is the strong threat.} Kf8 $2 {8.40/25} (19... Nf6 { 3.02/25} 20. exf6 Rxe1+ 21. Kf2 Qxf6 22. Kxe1 Nd6) 20. Rf2 {Threatens to win with Nh5.} Bc8 21. Nh5 g5 22. Bxc8 Qxc8 23. e6 Nd6 {[%tqu "En","","","","c3c4", "",10]} 24. c4 $1 {[%mdl 512]} Nxc4 25. Rxf7+ {White mates.} Kg8 {[%tqu "En", "","","","c1g5", "",10]} 26. Bxg5 $1 {[%mdl 512]} Rxe6 (26... hxg5 27. Qxg5+) 27. Rg7+ Kh8 28. Rxe6 hxg5 29. Rh6# {Accuracy: White = 84%, Black = 14%.} 1-0

No comments:

Post a Comment