6 May 2015

D43 Semi-Slav: 5.Bg5 h6 (1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nf3 e6 5.Bg5 h6 6.Bh4 dxc4 7.a4 Bb4 8.e3 b5 9.axb5 cxb5)

D43 Semi-Slav: 5.Bg5 h6 (1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nf3 e6 5.Bg5 h6 6.Bh4 dxc4 7.a4 Bb4 8.e3 b5 9.axb5 cxb5)

I think I will cover games from Chess.com and Red Hot Pawn on alternating days from now on as long as there are games to cover from those sites. So today I look at games from Red Hot Pawn and tomorrow games from Chess.com and so on. The end in this game is mysterious to me as I am not sure what happened in my brain when I played 22.Bc4 instead of just taking back the rook. Admittedly I would have been lost either way but had I taken the rook, I might have been able to struggle on for a bit longer. This was played in the second round of a tournament called 2014 August Banded Quartets I 1700-1800. In the first round of this tournament I was able to advance to this second round fairly easily but the second round I was lost almost every game. I ended up being fourth in the final group that consisted of five players. My opponent in this game, chessicle, won the second round and at the same time the whole tournament by winning all his games on the second round. From the 14 games he played in this tournament he was able to win 12, draw 1 and lose 1. In comparison I played 16 games, won 9 of them, drew 2 and lost 5 games. The difference in the total games played comes from the fact that I played on the first round in a group that had five players, while chessicle played in a group with 4 players. I have also added three mate in ones, one mate in two and one mate in six today.

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultElo
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 d5 2.c4 2.Nf3 c6 3.c4 Nf6 1/2-1/2 (34) Rakonitz,D (1479)-Brown,N (1457) San Francisco 2012 2...c6 2...e6 3.Nc3 c6 4.Nf3 0-1 (29) Fittante,G (2011)-Lazic,M (2465) Genova 2001 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nf3 e6 5.Bg5 h6 6.Bh4 D44 Semi-Slav Defense: Anti-Moscow Gambit dxc4 7.a4 7.e3 b5 8.a4 1/2-1/2 (34) Rakonitz,D (1479)-Brown,N (1457) San Francisco 2012 7...Bb4 8.e3 b5 9.axb5 cxb5 D43 Semi-Slav: 5.Bg5 h6 10.Be2 10.Nd2! 10...Nbd7 10...Bb7 11.0-0 11.Qc2 a6 11...0-0 12.0-0 a6 13.Rfd1 Nbd7 14.Ne5 Bxc3 15.bxc3 Qc7 16.Nxd7 Nxd7 17.e4 Qf4 18.Bg3 Qxe4 19.Qxe4 Bxe4 20.Bd6 Rfc8 21.Bg4 Nf6 22.Be2 Nd5 23.Rdc1 Rc6 24.Bc5 Nf4 25.Bf1 Bd3 26.g3 Perez Garcia,S (1568)-Salazar de la Cruz,J (1897) Fuerteventura 2015 0-1 (64) 12.0-0 Nbd7 13.Ne5 Be7 14.Bf3 Bxf3 15.Nxf3 Nd5 16.Bxe7 Nxe7 17.Qe4 0-0 18.Qb7 Qc8 19.Qxc8 Rfxc8 20.Ra2 Nc6 21.Rd1 Nb6 22.e4 Rd8 23.Raa1 Nb4 24.Rd2 f6 25.g3 Kf7 Fittante,G (2011)-Lazic, M (2465) Genova 2001 0-1 11...Qb6 11.0-0 Qb6N 11...a6 12.Nxb5 Bb7 13.Nc3 Qc7 14.Bg3 Qc8 15.Qa4 a5 16.Ne5 Bd5 17.h3 0-0 18.Rfc1 Bxc3 19.bxc3 Nb6 20.Qd1 Ne4 21.Bh2 Qd8 22.f3 Nf6 23.e4 Bb7 24.Nxc4 Nxc4 25.Bxc4 Ba6 26.Qd3 Rakonitz,D (1479)-Brown,N (1457) San Francisco 2012 1/2-1/2 (34) 12.Qc2 12.Na2 Be7 13.Nc3 12...Bb7 12...a5 13.Bg3 Bb7 13.b3 13.Bxf6 is a better defense. Nxf6 14.b3 13...Bxc3-+ 14.Qxc3 Ne4 14...Nd5-+ is more deadly. 15.Qc2 c3 15.Qc2 15.Qb4 g5 16.Ra5 15...c3 Better is 15...cxb3! 16.Qxb3 b4 16.b4 16.Bd3 f5 17.b4 16...g5 16...0-0 17.Bd3 Qc6 18.Bxe4 Qxe4 19.Qxc3 Rfc8 17.Bg3 17.Bd3 17...a5 Black should play 17...Ke7! 18.Bd3 Nxg3 19.fxg3 Rhc8 18.bxa5? White should try 18.Be5 0-0 19.Bd3 18...Rxa5 19.Bd3
And now Rxa5 would win. 19...Nxg3 20.hxg3 b4 21.Rfb1 White wants to play Ra4. Rxa1 22.Bc4? 22.Rxa1 0-0 23.Qb3 22...Rxb1+ Accuracy: White = 17%, Black = 54%.
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBRes
Vierjoki,T1914chessicle20000–1

No comments:

Post a Comment