E72 King's Indian: 4.e4 d6 5.g3 (1.c4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.Nc3 O-O 6.e4 c6 7.Nge2)

A bit newer game than usual and also I don't think I have posted any other 3 minute chess analysis before. One might argue that you should only look at the opening phase on blitz games as the rest is most likely not that accurately played. Then again I play like an idiot no matter the time controls so that might not apply to me anyway. How many of the readers can, for example, say that they have hang their queen in correspondence games, I have done so twice this year... And yes, I feel very ashamed of that fact. Then again, I have played my corr games almost like blitz lately, so replying to my opponents moves almost instantly I see them, has obvious drawbacks. I think the same kind of concentration loss has had a significant effect on my tactics solving. For instance, the rating I have in the tactics trainer at Chess.com has been around 300-400 points lower than it was when I was in my peak. If my memory serves me right, my rating used to be easily over 2000 and sometimes close to a 2200 mark. Now I have barely rating of 1700 there.

[Event "ICC 3 0"] [Site "Internet Chess Club"] [Date "2014.05.13"] [Round "?"] [White "Vierjoki, Timo"] [Black "OldBuddy"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "E72"] [WhiteElo "1342"] [BlackElo "1306"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.10 (30s), TV"] [PlyCount "82"] [EventDate "2014.??.??"] {[%evp 12,82,53,0,107,33,89,69,155,68,89,11,92,76,157,122,154,122,155,97,157, 97,146,104,176,-80,-57,-68,0,-113,-46,-132,-98,-132,-42,-92,-40,-63,-38,-46, -38,-46,-37,-454,-442,-422,-410,-393,-385,-537,-349,-495,-491,-482,-438,-589, -560,-579,-555,-585,-579,-779,-790,-787,-768,-29985,-29986,-29986,-29987, -29987,-29988,-29989,-29989]} 1. c4 d6 2. d4 Nf6 {A53 Old Indian Defense} 3. g3 g6 4. Bg2 Bg7 5. Nc3 O-O 6. e4 c6 7. Nge2 {0.00/26 E72 King's Indian: 4.e4 d6 5.g3. LiveBook: 98 Games} (7. Nf3 $14 {0.53/25}) 7... Bg4 {1.07/25} (7... e5 $11 {0.00/26}) 8. O-O {0.33/27} (8. f3 $16 {1.07/25} Bc8 9. O-O) 8... Bxe2 { 0.89/26} (8... Qc8 $14 {0.33/27}) 9. Qxe2 Nbd7 {1.55/22} (9... e5 $14 {0.69/28} ) 10. h3 {0.68/27} (10. e5 $16 {1.55/22}) 10... e5 $14 {[%tqu "En","","","", "d4d5","",10]} 11. Be3 {0.11/27} (11. d5 $1 $16 {0.89/23}) 11... Re8 $146 { 0.92/22} (11... Ng4 $11 {0.11/27 keeps the balance.}) (11... Qe7 12. Rad1 b6 13. Kh2 Rfd8 14. f4 h6 15. Qd2 exd4 16. Bxd4 Nb8 17. Rfe1 c5 18. Nd5 Nxd5 19. Bxg7 Kxg7 20. Qxd5 Na6 21. Qc6 {1/2-1/2 (21) Stabolewski,A (2219)-Hasenbank,D (2074) Hamburgo 2005}) 12. d5 c5 {1.57/26} (12... cxd5 $142 {0.76/28} 13. exd5 (13. cxd5 a6 $16) (13. Nxd5 Nxd5 14. cxd5 f5 $16) 13... a6) 13. a3 a6 14. Rab1 Rb8 15. b4 {0.97/28} (15. h4 $142 {1.55/26}) 15... Qc8 {1.57/25} (15... Qc7 $142 {0.97/28}) 16. b5 {0.97/30} ({White should play} 16. Na4 {1.57/25}) 16... a5 {1.46/26} (16... Nb6 $142 {0.97/30}) 17. a4 {1.04/37} (17. Bf3 $142 {1.46/26 }) 17... b6 {1.76/27} (17... Nb6 $16 {1.04/37}) 18. f4 $2 {-0.80/28 [#]} (18. h4 $18 {1.76/27}) 18... exf4 19. Bxf4 Qc7 {0.00/35} (19... Nh5 $15 {-0.68/27} 20. Qc2 Nxf4 21. gxf4 Qd8) 20. Nd1 {-1.13/26} (20. Bf3 $11 {0.00/35}) {[%tqu "En","","","","f6e4", "",10]} 20... Nh5 {-0.46/31} ({Better is} 20... Nxe4 $1 $17 {-1.13/26 [%mdl 512]} 21. Qc2 (21. Bxe4 f5 $17) 21... Bd4+ 22. Kh2 f5) 21. Ne3 {-1.32/27} (21. Kh2 $15 {-0.46/31}) 21... Nxf4 22. Rxf4 Ne5 {-0.42/30} ( 22... Qd8 $17 {-1.32/24} 23. Kh1 Qg5) 23. Rbf1 {-0.92/29} (23. Ng4 $15 { -0.42/30}) 23... Rf8 {-0.40/30} (23... h5 $17 {-0.92/29}) 24. Ng4 $15 Nxg4 25. Qxg4 Be5 26. R4f3 Rbe8 27. R3f2 $2 {-4.54/28 [%mdl 8192] [#]} (27. Rd3 $15 { -0.37/37}) 27... Bd4 $19 28. Kh2 Bxf2 29. Rxf2 Qe7 30. Qf4 Qe5 31. Qxe5 { -4.95/27} (31. Qf6 {-3.49/33 was necessary.}) 31... Rxe5 {[%mdl 4096] Endgame KRR-KRB} 32. Rf6 Rd8 33. h4 Kg7 34. Rf4 h6 35. g4 Rf8 36. g5 hxg5 37. hxg5 Rxg5 38. Kh3 Rh8+ {Black mates.} 39. Rh4 Rxh4+ 40. Kxh4 Rxg2 41. Kh3 Re2 {Accuracy: White = 15%, Black = 20%.} 0-1