Even if this game doesn't have the usual move order of the Stonewall Dutch, it does end up in a same position as it would after the usual move order 1.d4 f5 2.c4 e6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. g3 c6 5. Bg2 d5 6. 0-0. But it does miss the last move in that line 6...Bd6, so it must be classified under a different opening. I do have examples of the Leningrad Dutch as well, those in the usual move order but they have not yet been analysed so it will take some time to post even one of them. Until next time my fellow chess enthusiasts. Improved and updated analysis added on December 23rd, 2019.
The blog features analysed games of mine, consisting of chess, chess960 and 3 check. There are also puzzles that you can solve by moving the pieces on the board and the solution can be checked by using the engine provided by the ChessBase's publishing tool. All games and puzzles can be downloaded for free!
Dropdowns
18 Jul 2014
A93 Classical Dutch: Classical Stonewall: 7.b3 (1.c4 f5 2.g3 Nf6 3.Bg2 c6 4.d4 d5 5.Nf3 e6 6.O-O Be7 7.Nbd2 O-O 8.b3)
[Event "Corr game 23.8.2007 - 5.2.2008"]
[Site "www.redhotpawn.com"]
[Date "2008.02.05"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Vierjoki, Timo"]
[Black "saffa73"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "A93"]
[WhiteElo "1666"]
[BlackElo "1492"]
[Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.10 (5s), TV"]
[PlyCount "85"]
[EventDate "2008.??.??"]
[EventType "corr"]
1. c4 (1. d4 f5 (1... d5 2. Nf3 e6 3. c4 c6 4. Nbd2 f5 5. g3 Nf6 6. Bg2 Be7 {
1-0 (30) Epishin,V (2574)-Tatai,S (2372) Bratto 2008}) 2. g3 Nf6 3. Bg2 e6 4.
Nf3 Be7 5. O-O O-O 6. c4 d5 7. b3 c6 {1-0 (53) Schuurman,P (2234)-Matto,M
(1954) Gibraltar 2006}) (1. Nf3 d5 2. g3 e6 3. Bg2 f5 4. d4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6.
Nbd2 O-O 7. c4 {1-0 (30) Kiesel,L (1530)-Goldenbaum,T (1390) Magdeburg 2014})
1... f5 {A10 English Opening: Anglo-Dutch Defense} 2. g3 Nf6 3. Bg2 c6 4. d4 d5
5. Nf3 e6 6. O-O Be7 7. Nbd2 O-O 8. b3 {A93 Classical Dutch: Classical
Stonewall: 7.b3} Ne4 9. Bb2 Qe8 (9... Nd7 10. Ne5 (10. Ne1 Ndf6 (10... Bg5 11.
e3 Ndf6 12. Qe2 Nxd2 13. Qxd2 Ne4 14. Qe2 b6 15. f3 Nd6 16. Ba3 Ba6 17. Rc1 Be7
18. Nd3 dxc4 19. Ne5 Qc7 20. f4 Qb7 21. Nxc6 cxb3 22. Nxe7+ Qxe7 23. Qxa6 Rad8
24. axb3 g5 25. Rc6 {Kiesel,L (1530)-Goldenbaum,T (1390) Magdeburg 2014 1-0})
11. Ndf3 Ng4 12. Nd3 Qe8 13. Nfe5 Nxe5 14. Nxe5 Qh5 15. f3 Ng5 16. e3 Rf6 17.
f4 Qxd1 18. Rfxd1 Nf7 19. Nd3 h6 20. a4 a5 21. Rdc1 Bd8 22. Ba3 Rb8 23. Kf2 Bd7
24. b4 axb4 {Epishin,V (2574)-Tatai,S (2372) Bratto 2008 1-0}) 10... Bf6 11.
Ndf3 {1-0 (53) Schuurman,P (2234)-Matto,M (1954) Gibraltar 2006}) 10. Ne5 Nd7 {
White is slightly better.} 11. Ndf3 Bf6 12. Nxd7 $146 (12. Nd3 Qh5 13. Nf4 Qf7
14. Ne5 Qe7 15. Nfd3 Ng5 16. a4 Re8 17. Qc2 Bxe5 18. dxe5 h6 19. b4 Qf7 20. c5
Nf8 21. Bd4 Ng6 22. e3 Bd7 23. Rfb1 a6 24. Nc1 Rf8 25. Ne2 Qe7 26. h4 Nh7 {
Schuurman,P (2234)-Matto,M (1954) Gibraltar 2006 1-0 (53)}) 12... Bxd7 13. Ne5
Bxe5 14. dxe5 {Ba3 is the strong threat.} Qg6 15. e3 Rad8 16. Ba3 {aiming for
f3.} Rf7 {1.39/24} (16... Rfe8 $14 {0.66/18}) 17. f3 $16 Ng5 {1.87/22} (17...
Nxg3 $16 {1.36/21 might work better.} 18. hxg3 Qxg3) 18. h4 $36 {White is in
control.} Nh3+ {2.32/18} (18... Ne4 $142 {1.74/21}) 19. Kh2 f4 20. gxf4 Nxf4
21. exf4 Rxf4 22. Be7 Re8 23. Bg5 Rff8 24. Qd4 h6 25. Bd2 Qh5 26. Kg3 g5 {
3.65/23} (26... b6 $142 {2.15/18} 27. Rae1 Kh8) 27. hxg5 hxg5 {Threatening ...
Rf4.} 28. Rh1 Qg6 29. Qxa7 Re7 30. Qe3 Rg7 31. Bh3 Qf7 32. Bg4 Be8 {7.09/20} (
32... b5 $142 {4.02/11} 33. cxd5 cxd5) 33. Rh6 {White is clearly winning.} Qe7
34. Bxe6+ Bf7 35. Bxf7+ Rfxf7 36. Rah1 {[#]} Rh7 37. Rxh7 Rxh7 38. Rxh7 Qxh7
39. Qxg5+ Kf8 40. Qh6+ Qxh6 41. Bxh6+ Kf7 42. cxd5 {[#] Threatens to win with
d6.} cxd5 43. Be3 {Accuracy: White = 76%, Black = 23%.} 1-0
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment