If anything, this game that I have analysed today, shows how sometimes I just can't see tactics. For quite a long time now I have done 3 tactical exercises every day and that is the minimum amount but I may need to increase it, in order to improve my vision more. The level at which I see tactics now, is disgraceful at least to me. Only barely over 50% accuracy in solving is not all that good. Well, in truth that is only my accuracy in the tactical trainer at Chess.com. On Chess Tactics Server, I have managed a 85% solving accuracy but as it is based on solving the exercises as fast as possible, my tactical rating there is really bad, since I am old and slow... ;-)
The blog features analysed games of mine, consisting of chess, chess960 and 3 check. There are also puzzles that you can solve by moving the pieces on the board and the solution can be checked by using the engine provided by the ChessBase's publishing tool. All games and puzzles can be downloaded for free!
Dropdowns
28 Jul 2014
B00 Queen's Fianchetto Defence, Nimzowitsch Defense (1.e4 Nc6 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 Nf6 4.Nc3 Bg4 5.Be2 e6)
[Event "ICC 5 0"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2011.06.15"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Vierjoki, Timo"]
[Black "skumar"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B00"]
[WhiteElo "1529"]
[BlackElo "1661"]
[Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.10 (30s), TV"]
[PlyCount "79"]
[EventDate "2011.??.??"]
{[%evp 10,79,64,27,46,28,31,31,56,11,39,15,45,-25,-8,-27,-3,-44,-38,-18,-13,
-55,81,-238,41,-244,65,-90,124,115,118,29,31,32,26,0,29,-124,-121,-293,-120,
-104,-98,-140,-66,-66,88,91,177,163,369,185,187,173,321,150,29998,0,0,0,0,0,
29997,0,0,0,8,8,12,7,196,182]} 1. e4 Nc6 2. Nf3 d6 {B00 Nimzowitsch Defense:
Williams Variation} 3. d4 Nf6 4. Nc3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 {B00 Queen's Fianchetto
Defence, Nimzowitsch Defence} 6. O-O {LiveBook: 31 Games} (6. d5 $5 Bxf3 7.
gxf3 (7. Bxf3 exd5 8. exd5 Ne5 $14) 7... exd5 8. exd5 $14 (8. Nxd5 Nxd5 9. Qxd5
Be7 $14)) 6... d5 7. e5 (7. exd5 Nxd5 8. Nxd5 exd5 9. h3 Bh5 10. Re1 Be7 11.
Ne5 Bxe2 12. Qxe2 Nxe5 13. Qxe5 f6 14. Qh5+ g6 15. Qe2 Qd7 16. c4 c6 17. cxd5
cxd5 18. Bh6 Kf7 19. Qf3 Qf5 20. Qb3 Qd7 21. Re2 Rae8 {Khatoev,E (2277)
-Derbenev,A (2331) Kostroma 2011 1/2-1/2 (48)}) 7... Nd7 (7... Ne4 8. h3 Bf5 9.
Bd3 Nxc3 10. bxc3 Be7 11. Bxf5 exf5 12. Qd3 Qd7 13. Rb1 Rb8 14. Bg5 Bxg5 15.
Nxg5 O-O 16. Rfe1 Rfe8 17. f4 Nd8 18. Nf3 g6 19. g3 Ne6 {1/2-1/2 (19)
Sinitsina,A (2091)-Drugov,P (2302) Panevezys 2017}) 8. Be3 $146 {White is
slightly better.} (8. h3 Bh5 9. Bg5 Be7 10. Be3 Bxf3 11. Bxf3 Bg5 12. Bxg5 Qxg5
13. Ne2 O-O 14. Bg4 f5 15. exf6 Rxf6 16. f4 Qh6 17. Qd3 Raf8 18. f5 exf5 19.
Bxf5 Nb4 20. Qb5 Qe3+ 21. Kh2 Qe7 22. Ng3 Nb6 {Krebs, P-Werner,T Ratzeburg
1997 1/2-1/2 (40)}) 8... Na5 9. h3 {0.11/26} (9. Ng5 $14 {0.56/23} Bxe2 10.
Qxe2) 9... Bh5 10. Qd2 {Threatening Bg5.} b6 11. Nb5 {-0.25/24} (11. Ng5 $14 {
0.45/24} Bxe2 12. Qxe2) 11... Be7 12. b3 O-O 13. c4 {-0.44/26} (13. g4 $11 {
-0.03/28} Bg6 14. c4) 13... dxc4 $15 14. bxc4 Bxf3 15. Bxf3 {-0.55/26} (15.
gxf3 $11 {-0.13/29 might be stronger.} a6 16. Nc3) 15... Nxc4 {0.81/28} (15...
c6 $15 {-0.55/26} 16. Nc3 Nxc4) 16. Qd3 $2 {-2.38/29 [%mdl 8192]} (16. Qe2 $16
{0.81/28 keeps the pressure on.} Nxe3 17. Qxe3) {[%tqu "En","","","", "d7e5",
"",10]} 16... Nxe3 $2 {0.41/27} (16... Ndxe5 $1 $19 {-2.38/29 [%mdl 512]} 17.
Qe2 (17. dxe5 Qxd3) 17... Nxf3+ 18. Qxf3 Nxe3 19. fxe3 c5) 17. fxe3 $4 {
-2.44/27 [%mdl 8192]} (17. Qxe3 $14 {0.41/27 is the one way to stay ahead.} a6
18. Bxa8) {[%tqu "En","","","","d7e5","",10]} 17... Rb8 $2 {0.65/26} ({Better
is} 17... Nxe5 $1 $19 {-2.44/27 [%mdl 512]} 18. Qd1 (18. dxe5 Qxd3) 18... Nxf3+
19. Qxf3 c5) 18. Nxa7 $2 {-0.90/28} (18. Qe2 $14 {0.65/26 stays ahead.}) {
[%tqu "En","","","","d7e5","", 10]} 18... Qe8 $2 {1.24/23} (18... Nxe5 $1 $17 {
-0.90/28 [%mdl 512] and life is bright.} 19. Qb5 (19. dxe5 Qxd3) 19... Nxf3+
20. Rxf3 Ra8) 19. Nc6 $16 Rc8 20. Nxe7+ {0.29/28} (20. Rfc1 $16 {1.18/22})
20... Qxe7 $11 21. Be4 h6 22. Rf3 Rcd8 {[#] And now ...Nxe5! would win.} 23.
Rg3 $2 {-1.24/26} (23. Qc4 $11 {0.29/27}) {[%tqu "En","","","","d7e5","", 10]}
23... Nxe5 $1 $17 {[%mdl 512]} 24. Qe2 $2 {-2.93/24} (24. Qb5 $17 {-1.21/27}
Nd7 25. Bc2) (24. dxe5 Rxd3) 24... f5 {-1.20/28} (24... Qh4 $19 {-2.93/24 is
more deadly.} 25. Qf2 Qxe4 26. dxe5 Qxe5) 25. Bc2 Nf7 26. Rf1 {-1.40/22} (26.
Rf3 $142 {-0.98/24}) 26... Kh8 {-0.66/27} (26... Ng5 $17 {-1.40/22} 27. Qc4 Kh8
) 27. e4 $15 Nd6 $2 {0.88/31} (27... Qf6 $15 {-0.66/30} 28. exf5 exf5 29. Rxf5
Qxd4+ 30. Qe3 Qxe3+ 31. Rxe3 Nd6 32. Rxf8+ Rxf8) 28. exf5 $16 Qf6 {1.77/29} (
28... Rde8 $16 {0.91/30}) 29. fxe6 $18 Qxd4+ $2 {3.69/27} (29... Qxf1+ {1.63/27
} 30. Qxf1 Rxf1+ 31. Kxf1 g5) 30. Kh2 {1.85/35} (30. Kh1 $142 {3.69/27} Qc4 31.
Qxc4 Nxc4 32. Rxf8+ Rxf8 33. Rc3) 30... Rxf1 31. Qxf1 {e7 is the strong threat.
} Re8 {3.21/29} (31... Qe5 $142 {1.73/33}) {[%tqu "En","","","","c2g6","",10]}
32. e7 {1.50/32} (32. Bg6 $1 $18 {3.21/29 and the rest is easy.} Rg8 33. Qe2)
32... Qe5 $2 {#2/30 [#]} (32... Qf6 $16 {1.50/32} 33. Qd3 g6) {[%tqu "En","",
"","","f1f8","",10]} 33. Qd3 $2 {0.00/35} (33. Qf8+ $1 {#2/30} Rxf8 34. exf8=Q#
) 33... Kg8 $11 34. Qh7+ $40 {[%mdl 128] Black needs to defend precisely.} Kf7
35. Bb3+ Kf6 $2 {#3/30 [%mdl 8192]} (35... Kxe7 $11 {0.00/30} 36. Qxg7+ Kd8)
36. Qg6+ $2 {0.00/34} (36. Qxg7+ {#3/30 mates} Kf5 37. Qg6+ Kf4 38. Qg4#) 36...
Kxe7 {aiming for ...Nf5.} 37. Qxg7+ Qxg7 38. Rxg7+ Kd8 39. Rh7 Ne4 $2 {1.96/24}
(39... c5 $11 {0.07/27}) 40. Rxh6 {Accuracy: White = 17%, Black = 11%.} 1-0
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment