21 Jul 2015

A61 Modern Benoni: Nf3 without early e4 (1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 e6 4.Nc3 exd5 5.cxd5 d6 6.Nf3 g6 7.Bg5 Bg7 8.e3 O-O)

A61 Modern Benoni: Nf3 without early e4 (1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 e6 4.Nc3 exd5 5.cxd5 d6 6.Nf3 g6 7.Bg5 Bg7 8.e3 O-O)

As there are some correspondence games that have finished recently, I will go through them before going to my FIDE Online Arena and over the board games. The game below was played in a small team match called Open Challenge Let's Play Benoni. I call it small because it was played on only three boards between Let's Play Benoni and Himgouree's club. I played on board 3 for Himgouree's club and won both my games against opticRED. The score at the end was 1 - 5 in favor of the away team Himgouree's club.

Some of the openings that I have seen listed in the book openings at Chess.com have a # sign at the end and if I put those in the notation, ChessBase 12 considers them as evaluation marks and puts the #3, for instance, in front of the name of the opening and I can't remove the #3 from that place of the notation anymore... Or at least I do not know how to do it. That is a bit annoying but I could of course just work around the problem by leaving the # out of the notation, which I never of course remember to do when I type the name of the variation in the notation... Well maybe next time I remember to do that and make my life a bit easier as a result. I have added one mate in two, three mate in threes and one mate in six today.

[Event "Open Challenge Let's Play Benoni - Boar"] [Site "Chess.com"] [Date "2015.01.02"] [Round "?"] [White "Vierjoki, Timo"] [Black "opticRED"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "A61"] [WhiteElo "1927"] [BlackElo "1763"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.10 (5s), TV"] [PlyCount "83"] [EventDate "2015.??.??"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 (2. Nf3 c5 (2... e6) 3. d5 e6 4. c4 exd5 5. cxd5 d6 {1/2-1/2 (34) Di Camillo,A-Saidy,A Oklahoma city 1956} (5... g6 6. Nc3 Bg7 7. Bg5 O-O 8. e3 {0-1 (89) Ostermeyer,P (2440)-Steinbacher,M (2265) Germany 1983})) 2... c5 ( 2... e6 3. Nf3 c5 {0-1 (89) Ostermeyer,P (2440)-Steinbacher,M (2265) Germany 1983}) 3. d5 e6 4. Nc3 exd5 5. cxd5 d6 6. Nf3 g6 7. Bg5 {A61 Benoni Defense: Uhlmann Variation} Bg7 8. e3 O-O {0.92/20 A61 Modern Benoni: Nf3 without early e4} (8... h6 $11 {-0.17/23} 9. Bh4 a6) 9. Qb3 $146 {-0.61/22 [#]} (9. Nd2 $16 { 0.92/20}) (9. Be2 Na6 (9... Bg4 10. Nd2 Bxe2 11. Qxe2 Nbd7 12. O-O Re8 13. a4 h6 14. Bh4 a6 15. a5 Qc7 16. Ra3 Ne5 17. e4 c4 18. Ra4 Rac8 19. Bg3 Nfd7 20. f4 b5 21. axb6 Qxb6+ 22. Kh1 Qxb2 23. fxe5 Qxc3 24. Nxc4 {Ostermeyer,P (2440) -Steinbacher,M (2265) Germany 1983 0-1 (89)}) (9... a6 10. a4 b6 11. O-O h6 12. Bf4 Nh5 13. Bg3 Nxg3 14. hxg3 Nd7 15. Nd2 Bb7 16. Qb3 Rb8 17. Rad1 Bc8 18. Nc4 Ne5 19. Na5 Qc7 20. Nc4 Re8 21. Rfe1 Kh7 22. Nxe5 Bxe5 23. f4 Bg7 24. Bf3 { Laska,K-Grabec,M Zlin 1958 0-1 (41)}) 10. O-O Nc7 (10... h6 11. Bh4 Nc7 { 1-0 (39) Demirkhanian,A-Etruk,R Moscow 1963}) 11. a4 h6 12. Bh4 g5 (12... a6 13. Nd2 b6 14. e4 Rb8 15. f4 Qd7 16. Nc4 Nfe8 17. a5 bxa5 18. Qa4 Nb5 19. Qxa5 Nec7 20. f5 Re8 21. fxg6 fxg6 22. Bd3 Bd4+ 23. Kh1 g5 24. Bg3 Bg7 25. Nb6 Qe7 26. Rae1 Bg4 27. Nc4 {Demirkhanian,A-Etruk,R Moscow 1963 1-0 (39)}) 13. Bg3 Nh5 14. Qd3 Nxg3 15. hxg3 Na6 16. Rad1 Nb4 17. Qb1 a6 18. Nd2 f5 19. Nc4 b6 20. Rd2 Rb8 21. Qd1 Qe7 22. Re1 Bd7 23. g4 fxg4 {Di Camillo,A-Saidy,A Oklahoma city 1956 1/2-1/2 (34)}) (9. Bd3 a6 10. Qc2 Qa5 11. O-O b5 12. Bxf6 Bxf6 13. Ne4 Qd8 14. Nxf6+ Qxf6 15. b3 Bg4 16. Nd2 Qg5 17. Ne4 Qe7 18. Qb2 Nd7 19. Nd2 Qg5 20. Ne4 Qxd5 21. f3 Qxd3 22. Rad1 Qxe3+ 23. Kh1 Bf5 {Von Koenen,H-Schumacher,H Schleswig Holstein 1991 0-1 (35)}) 9... Nbd7 {0.82/19} (9... h6 $15 {-0.61/22} 10. Bh4 Nbd7) 10. Bd3 {-0.26/23} ({White should try} 10. Nd2 $16 {0.82/19}) 10... a6 {0.33/21} (10... b5 $11 {-0.26/23} 11. Nxb5 (11. Bxb5 Rb8 $11) 11... Qa5+ 12. Qc3 Qb6) 11. a4 $1 $14 {White is slightly better.} h6 12. Bh4 Qe7 { 0.53/24} (12... Qb6 $11 {0.00/24} 13. Qxb6 Nxb6) 13. O-O {-0.31/25} (13. Nd2 $1 $14 {0.53/24}) 13... Ne5 {0.76/20} (13... g5 $1 $15 {-0.31/25} 14. Bg3 Nh5) 14. Nxe5 $16 Qxe5 15. Bg3 {0.10/20} ({White should play} 15. Rae1 $16 {0.89/19}) 15... Qe7 $11 16. h3 Bf5 {1.83/20} (16... Nd7 $14 {0.38/21}) 17. Bxf5 {1.05/22} (17. e4 $1 $18 {1.83/20} Bc8 (17... Bxe4 18. Rfe1) 18. Qb6) 17... gxf5 $16 18. a5 Ne4 19. Bf4 {0.00/25} (19. Nxe4 $16 {1.17/18} fxe4 20. Qb6) 19... Nxc3 $2 { 1.73/21 [#]} (19... Nd2 $11 {0.00/25 and Black is okay.} 20. Qb6 Nc4) 20. bxc3 $18 Rac8 {2.21/20} (20... c4 $142 {1.64/25} 21. Qxc4 Rfc8) 21. Ra4 Qf6 {3.07/20 } (21... Rc7 $142 {2.18/25} 22. Rb1 Qf6) 22. Rc1 {1.47/22} (22. Qxb7 $18 { 3.07/20 has better winning chances.} Ra8 23. Rb1) 22... Qe7 {2.39/22} (22... Rc7 $16 {1.47/22 might work better.} 23. Rb1 Re8) 23. Qb6 Rfd8 {2.34/25} (23... Rfe8 $142 {1.75/26} 24. Bxd6 Qd7) 24. Bg3 {1.05/24} (24. Qb1 $18 {2.34/25}) 24... Qc7 {2.25/22} (24... Qd7 $16 {1.05/24} 25. Rf4 Be5) 25. Qb1 Qd7 26. Rf4 Be5 $2 {4.07/20} (26... c4 {2.13/25 was called for.} 27. Rxf5 (27. Qxf5 Qxf5 28. Rxf5 Rc5 $11) 27... Rc5) 27. Rf3 Bxg3 28. Rxg3+ Kh8 29. Rf3 Rg8 30. Qxf5 ({ Not} 30. Rxf5 Rg5 $18) 30... Qxf5 31. Rxf5 {Endgame KRR-KRR} Rc7 32. Rf6 Rg6 33. Rf4 Kg7 34. Rb1 Rg5 35. e4 Rd7 36. Rb6 f6 37. c4 Kf7 38. Rf3 Ke7 $2 { 6.08/22} (38... Re5 {3.43/27} 39. Re3 h5) 39. Rfb3 {White is clearly winning.} Re5 40. f3 Kd8 41. Rxb7 Rxb7 42. Rxb7 {Accuracy: White = 42%, Black = 14%.} 1-0

No comments:

Post a Comment